TFCC Tear | Palmer & Atzei Classification
WristWidget Medical Resource
TFCC Classification
The Complete Guide to Palmer and Atzei Systems
Quick Summary
TFCC tears are classified using two systems. The Palmer Classification (1989) divides lesions into traumatic (Class 1A–1D) and degenerative (Class 2A–2E) categories and is the global standard for surgical reporting. The Atzei Classification (2009) focuses specifically on peripheral tears and DRUJ instability, classifying tears into 5 classes to directly guide surgical decision-making. Wrist arthroscopy is the gold standard for classification; MR arthrography is the preferred imaging modality. Foveal integrity — not styloid involvement — is the critical determinant of DRUJ stability and surgical approach.
What Is the TFCC?
The Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC) is a critical load-bearing and stabilizing structure located on the ulnar (pinky) side of the wrist. It is not a single structure but rather a collection of fibrocartilaginous and ligamentous tissues that work in concert to:
- Transmit loads from the hand to the forearm
- Stabilize the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ)
- Support the ulnar carpus
- Facilitate smooth forearm rotation (pronation and supination)
Injuries to the TFCC are among the most common causes of ulnar-sided wrist pain and are frequently misdiagnosed or delayed in diagnosis, sometimes by months or years. Understanding the classification of TFCC lesions is the cornerstone of accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment planning.
Anatomy of the TFCC
Before applying any classification system, a firm grasp of TFCC anatomy is essential. The TFCC was formally described by Palmer and Werner in 1981 and consists of the following components:
Figure 1
TFCC Anatomy — Coronal View (Proximal Surface)
Fig. 1 — Coronal view of the TFCC from the proximal (radiocarpal joint) surface. The central articular disc (green) spans from the sigmoid notch of the radius to the ulnar head. Dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments (yellow) originate at the sigmoid notch and converge at the fovea (amber) — the deep attachment point critical to DRUJ stability. Peripheral rim is vascularized (good healing potential); the central zone is avascular (poor healing). LT = lunotriquetral; RUL = radioulnar ligament; ECU = extensor carpi ulnaris.
Central Articular Disc
The avascular, biconcave fibrocartilaginous disc spanning the space between the sigmoid notch of the radius and the ulnar head. It serves as the primary load-bearing element of the TFCC, absorbing approximately 20% of axial load across the wrist. Because of its avascularity, central disc tears have limited healing capacity.
Radioulnar Ligaments (Dorsal and Volar)
These originate from the sigmoid notch of the radius and insert at the ulnar styloid base and the fovea. They are the primary stabilizers of the DRUJ. The deep fibers (ligamentum subcruentum) insert at the fovea; the superficial fibers insert at the base of the ulnar styloid. Foveal disruption produces significant DRUJ instability.
Ulnocarpal Ligaments
Including the ulnolunate and ulnotriquetral ligaments, which provide ulnocarpal support and restrain the carpus from ulnar translocation.
ECU Subsheath & Meniscus Homologue
The ECU subsheath stabilizes the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon in the ulnar groove, contributing to overall ulnar wrist stability. The meniscus homologue is a loose fold of synovial tissue contributing to joint lubrication.
ⓘ Key Takeaway
The fovea — a small depression at the base of the ulnar styloid — is the most clinically important anatomical landmark in TFCC pathology. Foveal tears involving the deep fibers of the radioulnar ligaments produce true DRUJ instability, driving much of the Atzei classification.
Why Classification Matters
TFCC injuries exist on a spectrum. A small central disc tear in a sedentary older adult requires entirely different management than a foveal avulsion in a 25-year-old competitive gymnast. Classification systems serve to:
- Standardize communication between surgeons, therapists, and researchers
- Predict healing potential (vascular vs. avascular zones)
- Guide surgical decision-making (debridement vs. repair vs. reconstruction)
- Establish prognosis for return to activity
- Facilitate research comparability across institutions
The two most widely used and clinically validated systems are the Palmer Classification (1989) and the Atzei Classification (2009).
The Palmer Classification System (1989)
Dr. Alexander Palmer introduced the first widely accepted TFCC classification in 1989, published in the Journal of Hand Surgery. It remains the most referenced system in clinical practice and surgical literature. The Palmer system divides TFCC lesions into two broad classes:
- Class 1: Traumatic lesions (subdivisions A–D)
- Class 2: Degenerative lesions (subdivisions A–E)
Figure 2
Palmer Classification of TFCC Lesions (1989)
Each diagram shows a simplified coronal cross-section of the TFCC. Red indicates the site of pathology.
Class 1 — Traumatic
Horizontal tear in avascular central disc. Peripheral rim and radioulnar ligaments intact.
Avulsion at ulnar attachment (styloid/fovea). Most surgically significant traumatic tear.
Distal avulsion of ulnocarpal ligaments from carpals. Causes ulnocarpal instability.
Avulsion at radial origin (sigmoid notch). Rarest traumatic type; ± bony fragment.
Class 2 — Degenerative (Ulnar Impaction Continuum)
TFCC thinning. No perforation. Earliest degenerative stage.
Thinning + chondromalacia lunate/ulnar head. Ulnar impaction onset.
Frank disc perforation + chondromalacia. Communication between joint spaces.
2C findings + lunotriquetral ligament disruption. Risk of VISI deformity.
All 2D findings + ulnocarpal arthritis. Bone-on-bone at ulnocarpal joint.
Fig. 2 — Palmer Classification (1989). Class 1 (Traumatic): tears resulting from a discrete injury. Class 2 (Degenerative): progressive degeneration typically associated with positive ulnar variance and ulnar impaction syndrome. Red markers indicate site of pathology. Yellow = radioulnar ligaments; green = articular disc; purple = ulnocarpal/LT ligaments.
1ACentral Perforation
Definition: A horizontal perforation or tear of the central articular disc, located in the avascular zone.
Mechanism: Most commonly caused by compression loading with axial rotation — a sudden, forceful twisting of the wrist.
- Located in the central, avascular portion of the disc (poor intrinsic healing)
- Does not cause DRUJ instability — peripheral stabilizers are intact
- May produce clicking, catching, or ulnar-sided pain with grip and rotation
- One of the most common TFCC tear types seen clinically and on MRI
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 1A tears are the most commonly imaged TFCC lesion. Because the peripheral ligaments are intact, DRUJ is stable and non-surgical management is appropriate for many patients. Debridement is curative for pain in most cases.
1BUlnar Avulsion
Definition: Avulsion or disruption of the TFCC at its ulnar attachment — at the ulnar styloid or fovea — with or without a concurrent ulnar styloid fracture.
Mechanism: Forced extension and ulnar deviation, or distraction injury to the ulnar wrist. Commonly associated with distal radius fractures.
- Disruption of the peripheral, vascular zone of the TFCC
- Frequently involves the ulnar attachment of the radioulnar ligaments
- Can produce DRUJ instability if the foveal attachment is compromised
- Potential for healing is higher due to vascular supply
Critical Subtype: When the foveal attachment of the deep radioulnar ligaments is disrupted, significant DRUJ instability results. This is more specifically addressed by the Atzei classification.
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 1B is the most surgically significant traumatic TFCC tear. Foveal involvement must be confirmed or excluded — styloid-only tears and foveal avulsions require different surgical approaches. The Atzei system refines this distinction precisely.
1CDistal Ulnocarpal Ligament Disruption
Definition: Avulsion or tear of the ulnocarpal ligaments (ulnolunate and/or ulnotriquetral ligaments) from their distal carpal attachments.
Mechanism: Hypersupination or volar flexion forces stressing the ulnar extrinsic ligaments.
- Less common than 1A and 1B lesions
- Can cause ulnocarpal instability — the carpus may sublux or shift
- May present with a painful clunk during forearm rotation
- Often missed on standard MRI; requires wrist arthrography or arthroscopy to confirm
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 1C lesions cause ulnocarpal instability rather than DRUJ instability. They are frequently missed on standard MRI and require wrist arthrography or arthroscopy to confirm. A painful clunk during rotation is a hallmark presentation.
1DRadial Avulsion
Definition: Tear or avulsion of the TFCC at its radial attachment at the sigmoid notch, with or without a bony fragment.
Mechanism: Forced distraction or rotational loading across the DRUJ, ulnar deviation with axial load.
- Least common of the traumatic subtypes
- Disrupts the radial origin of the radioulnar ligaments
- DRUJ instability is common — both dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments may be avulsed
- Bony avulsion at the sigmoid notch rim may be visible on plain radiographs
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 1D is the rarest traumatic type. Because both dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments may be avulsed at the radial origin, DRUJ instability is common. A small chip fracture at the sigmoid notch rim may be the only plain radiograph finding.
Degenerative Lesions (Class 2)
Degenerative lesions are part of a progressive, age-related or ulnar impaction-driven continuum. They are not the result of a discrete traumatic event but rather cumulative mechanical wear, often exacerbated by positive ulnar variance.
2ATFCC Thinning Without Perforation
Early degenerative change with disc thinning but without frank perforation. Articular disc shows early fibrillation or softening. Often an incidental finding in patients over 40. May be asymptomatic or produce mild ulnar-sided discomfort.
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 2A is often an incidental finding in middle-aged patients. It represents the earliest stage of ulnar impaction syndrome and signals the need to assess ulnar variance on plain radiograph.
2BThinning + Chondromalacia
Degenerative TFCC thinning plus cartilage softening (chondromalacia) on the proximal surface of the lunate and/or the ulnar head. Classic ulnar impaction syndrome begins here. Patients report activity-related ulnar wrist pain, worsened by ulnar deviation and loading.
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 2B represents the onset of true ulnar impaction syndrome. Ulnar shortening osteotomy should be considered early at this stage to prevent progression to disc perforation and carpal ligament damage.
2CPerforation + Chondromalacia
Frank perforation of the TFCC disc with chondromalacia of the lunate and/or ulnar head. A distinct hole or defect through the central disc creates communication between the radiocarpal and distal radioulnar joints.
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 2C is the tipping point in ulnar impaction syndrome. The perforation creates communication between the radiocarpal and DRUJ compartments. Surgical intervention is indicated in symptomatic patients who fail conservative care.
2DPerforation + Chondromalacia + LT Disruption
All findings of 2C, plus disruption or attenuation of the lunotriquetral (LT) interosseous ligament. LT ligament attenuation leads to lunotriquetral instability; VISI pattern may develop in advanced cases.
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 2D demands careful assessment of lunotriquetral stability. A painful clunk with wrist motion is a red flag. VISI deformity may develop if LT disruption is untreated.
2EAll of 2D + Ulnocarpal Arthritis
End-stage degenerative disease — all findings of 2D plus ulnocarpal arthritis. Radiographic arthritic changes at the ulnocarpal joint with bone-on-bone contact at the ulnar head–lunate and/or ulnar head–triquetrum articulation.
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Class 2E is end-stage ulnar impaction. Joint-preserving procedures should be exhausted before ulnar head resection is considered.
Palmer Classification — Summary Table
| Class | Subtype | Description | DRUJ Stable? | Healing Potential |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (Traumatic) | 1A | Central disc perforation | Yes | Poor (avascular) |
| 1 (Traumatic) | 1B | Ulnar avulsion ± styloid fracture | Variable | Good (vascular) |
| 1 (Traumatic) | 1C | Distal ulnocarpal ligament tear | Yes | Variable |
| 1 (Traumatic) | 1D | Radial avulsion ± sigmoid notch fracture | Often No | Good (vascular) |
| 2 (Degenerative) | 2A | TFCC thinning, no perforation | Yes | — |
| 2 (Degenerative) | 2B | Thinning + chondromalacia | Yes | — |
| 2 (Degenerative) | 2C | Perforation + chondromalacia | Yes | — |
| 2 (Degenerative) | 2D | Perforation + chondromalacia + LT disruption | Variable | — |
| 2 (Degenerative) | 2E | All of 2D + ulnocarpal arthritis | Variable | — |
The Atzei Classification System (2009)
In 2009, Italian hand surgeon Dr. Andrea Atzei — working alongside Dr. Riccardo Luchetti — published a refined classification focused specifically on peripheral TFCC tears and their relationship to DRUJ stability. The system is arthroscopy-based and directly guides surgical management based on two key arthroscopic findings:
- The trampoline test — assessing tension and resilience of the TFCC disc
- Foveal attachment integrity — assessed via the hook test and direct probing
Figure 3
Atzei Classification of Peripheral TFCC Tears (2009)
Focused on peripheral tears and DRUJ instability. Based on arthroscopic trampoline and hook test findings. Coronal cross-section — styloid at right edge.
Foveal Tear — Disc Intact
Deep RUL avulsed from fovea. Disc resilient and intact.
Rx: Foveal reinsertion
Complete Peripheral Tear
Full peripheral disruption; fovea and styloid involved. Disc still viable.
Rx: Peripheral repair ± foveal reinsertion
Irreparable — Disc Destroyed
Peripheral tear with disc structural failure. Primary repair not possible.
Rx: Tendon graft reconstruction
Irreparable + DRUJ Arthritis
End-stage: destroyed disc + established DRUJ osteoarthritis.
Rx: Salvage procedure
Central/Radial Tear — No Peripheral
Isolated central disc tear. Peripheral rim and fovea intact. Equivalent to Palmer 1A.
Rx: Arthroscopic debridement
Arthroscopic Test Guide
Fig. 3 — Atzei Classification (2009). Designed specifically to guide surgical decision-making for peripheral TFCC tears. Classes 1–4 all have DRUJ instability; only Class 5 is DRUJ-stable. The progression from left to right reflects increasing structural damage and diminishing repair potential. Yellow = radioulnar ligaments; green = articular disc; amber = fovea; red markers = site of pathology/disruption.
Atzei 1Reparable Foveal Tears — Intact Disc
The deep fibers of the radioulnar ligaments are torn from the fovea, but the TFCC disc itself remains intact and resilient. Patient has DRUJ instability with a subjectively normal disc.
Arthroscopic Findings
- Trampoline test: Positive — disc is taut and bouncy (intact disc)
- Hook test: Positive — disc can be hooked and pulled distally (foveal loss of anchor)
- From DRUJ portal: bare fovea is visible — ligament has avulsed
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Atzei Class 1 represents the most curable form of DRUJ instability. Because the disc is intact, foveal reinsertion alone restores full stability. Missing this diagnosis leads to progressive instability and arthrosis.
Atzei 2Reparable Peripheral Tears — Partial Foveal Involvement
A complete peripheral tear involving both the distal (styloid) insertion and the proximal (foveal) attachment. Both styloid and foveal attachments are compromised; DRUJ instability is present.
Arthroscopic Findings
- Trampoline test: Positive (possibly reduced resilience)
- Hook test: Positive — disc displacement is seen
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Atzei Class 2 requires addressing both the peripheral capsular tear and the foveal component. Combined arthroscopic repair yields excellent outcomes in acute presentations.
Atzei 3Irreparable Peripheral Tears — Disc Destruction
Peripheral tear where the disc itself is also damaged — articular disc has lost structural integrity, rendering primary repair impossible.
Arthroscopic Findings
- Trampoline test: Negative — disc is flaccid with no resilience
- Hook test: Positive — disc can be displaced
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Atzei Class 3 signals that primary repair is no longer possible. Tendon graft reconstruction (commonly palmaris longus) can restore functional stability, but outcomes are less predictable than Classes 1–2.
Atzei 4Irreparable Tears + Chronic DRUJ Arthritis
All findings of Class 3, plus established DRUJ osteoarthritis. Long-standing ulnar wrist pain and instability with radiographic DRUJ arthritic changes.
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Atzei Class 4 is end-stage failure. Procedure choice depends on patient age, demand level, and remaining bone stock. Ulnar head arthroplasty is increasingly preferred to preserve carpal support.
Atzei 5Central/Radial Disc Tears — No Peripheral Involvement
Isolated tear of the central articular disc without peripheral ligamentous disruption. Equivalent to Palmer 1A. DRUJ is stable.
Arthroscopic Findings
- Trampoline test: Positive — peripheral rim and radioulnar ligaments intact
- Hook test: Negative — peripheral rim cannot be displaced
ⓘ Key Takeaway
Atzei Class 5 is equivalent to Palmer Class 1A. DRUJ stability is preserved because the peripheral radioulnar ligaments are intact. A positive trampoline test with a negative hook test confirms the diagnosis intraoperatively.
Atzei Classification — Summary
Table 1 of 2 — Tissue status & stability
| Class | Description | Disc Status | Fovea | DRUJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foveal tear, intact disc | Intact | Disrupted | Unstable |
| 2 | Complete peripheral tear, repairable | Intact / minor damage | Disrupted | Unstable |
| 3 | Disc destroyed, no arthrosis | Destroyed | Disrupted | Unstable |
| 4 | Disc destroyed + DRUJ arthrosis | Destroyed | Disrupted | Unstable |
| 5 | Central disc tear only | Perforated centrally | Intact | Stable |
Table 2 of 2 — Arthroscopic tests & management
| Class | Trampoline Test | Hook Test | Recommended Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Positive (taut, resilient) | Positive (disc displaces) | Foveal reinsertion |
| 2 | Reduced resilience | Positive | Peripheral repair ± foveal reinsertion |
| 3 | Negative (flaccid) | Positive | Reconstruction (tendon graft) |
| 4 | Negative (flaccid) | Positive | Salvage procedure |
| 5 | Positive (rim intact) | Negative (disc anchored) | Arthroscopic debridement |
Palmer vs. Atzei: Key Differences
The Palmer system provides a broad taxonomy covering both traumatic and degenerative TFCC pathology — excellent for initial categorization and the backbone of most radiology and surgical reporting worldwide. The Atzei system is narrower but far more surgically actionable, designed specifically to guide the decision of how to treat peripheral TFCC lesions with respect to the DRUJ.
The critical advance Atzei introduced is explicit distinction between styloid-only tears and true foveal disruptions. Palmer Class 1B includes all ulnar-side tears without meaningfully differentiating them. A Palmer 1B tear with intact foveal attachment may be treated with peripheral suture repair with excellent prognosis. A Palmer 1B tear with foveal avulsion that is missed will result in chronic DRUJ instability, pain, and progressive arthritis.
Surgical Decision Tree
| Clinical Scenario | Palmer | Atzei | Recommended Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central disc perforation, no instability | 1A | 5 | Debridement |
| Peripheral tear, DRUJ stable, disc intact | 1B (styloid) | 2 | Peripheral repair |
| Peripheral tear, DRUJ unstable, disc intact | 1B (foveal) | 1 | Foveal reinsertion |
| Peripheral tear, DRUJ unstable, disc destroyed | 1B (foveal) | 3 | Reconstruction |
| Chronic instability with DRUJ arthritis | 1B | 4 | Salvage procedure |
| Degenerative perforation, ulnar impaction | 2C / 2D / 2E | 5 (if central) | Ulnar shortening osteotomy ± debridement |
How Classifications Guide Treatment
Non-Surgical (Conservative) Candidates
- Palmer 1A / Atzei 5: Central tears without instability — especially in lower-demand individuals
- Palmer 1B (styloid only) without DRUJ instability
- Degenerative lesions (Palmer 2A–2C) managed with activity modification, anti-inflammatory therapy, and bracing
Conservative management protocol: immobilization in a Muenster-type or above-elbow splint/cast for 4–6 weeks (neutral forearm rotation), NSAIDs or corticosteroid injection, occupational therapy, and WristWidget bracing for DRUJ support.
Surgical Treatment by Classification
- Arthroscopic debridement (Palmer 1A, Atzei 5): Torn or frayed central disc tissue debrided to a smooth, stable margin. High success rates for pain relief.
- Arthroscopic peripheral repair (Atzei 2, Palmer 1B styloid): Outside-in or inside-out suturing reattaches the peripheral rim to the ulnar capsule.
- Foveal reinsertion (Atzei 1, Palmer 1B foveal): Deep radioulnar ligament fibers reattached to the fovea via transosseous tunnels. Most critical repair for DRUJ stability.
- TFCC reconstruction (Atzei 3): Tendon graft (palmaris longus) woven through drill holes to recreate the radioulnar ligament complex.
- Salvage procedures (Atzei 4, Palmer 2E): Darrach procedure (ulnar head excision), Sauvé–Kapandji (DRUJ fusion), ulnar head arthroplasty, or ulnar shortening osteotomy.
Diagnostic Tools
Accurate classification depends on appropriate diagnostic workup. No single test is 100% sensitive or specific for TFCC pathology.
Clinical Examination
- Ulnar fovea sign (Nakamura): Point tenderness in the soft spot between the FCU and ulnar head — sensitivity 95.2%, specificity 86.5% for foveal tears and DRUJ instability.
- DRUJ stress test (ballottement): Dorsal and volar translation of the ulnar head — assesses DRUJ instability
- Press test: Patient presses up from a chair using the symptomatic hand — reproduction of ulnar pain suggests TFCC pathology
- Ulnar grind test: Axial compression with ulnar deviation and forearm rotation
Imaging
- Plain radiographs: Assess ulnar variance; rule out fractures. Weight-bearing PA view most accurately assesses dynamic ulnar variance.
- MRI (standard): Sensitivity 75–100% depending on technique. 3T preferred over 1.5T. Cannot assess DRUJ stability; peripheral/foveal tears may be underdetected.
- MR arthrography (MRA): Gold standard imaging. Intra-articular contrast improves detection of disc perforations, peripheral tears, and LT ligament disruption.
- Wrist arthroscopy: Gold standard for diagnosis and classification. Allows direct visualization and probing (trampoline test, hook test). Simultaneously diagnostic and therapeutic.
TFCC Tears & DRUJ Instability
DRUJ instability is the single most functionally significant complication of peripheral TFCC tears, particularly those involving the foveal attachment (Atzei Class 1–3).
The DRUJ is inherently a bony incongruous joint — the sigmoid notch provides minimal osseous constraint, making soft tissue stabilizers paramount. In supination, the dorsal radioulnar ligament is taut. In pronation, the volar radioulnar ligament is taut. Both must be intact for full DRUJ stability throughout forearm rotation.
Grading DRUJ Instability
- Grade 1: Increased translation but a firm endpoint
- Grade 2: Increased translation with a soft endpoint
- Grade 3: Complete dislocation
Missed foveal tears with DRUJ instability progress to chronic pain and weakness, loss of forearm rotation, DRUJ arthrosis (Atzei Class 4), and compromised grip strength. The Atzei classification's primary value is preventing this progression through early, accurate identification.
WristWidget & TFCC Rehabilitation
Whether managing a TFCC tear conservatively or post-operatively, controlling DRUJ motion and providing ulnar-side wrist support is essential for pain management, healing, and return to function.
The WristWidget is a patented, adjustable ulnar wrist support specifically designed for TFCC injuries and DRUJ instability. Unlike standard wrist braces that immobilize the entire wrist, it provides targeted ulnar-side compression while allowing relatively normal wrist flexion/extension — enabling daily activities and exercise.
| Palmer Class | Atzei Class | WristWidget Role |
|---|---|---|
| 1A / 2C (central tears) | 5 | Pain relief during activity, loading support |
| 1B with mild instability | 1–2 (post-op repair) | Post-surgical support during rehabilitation |
| All conservative management | All stable classes | Primary bracing during immobilization phase |
| Return to sport | All | Activity support to prevent re-injury |
Rehabilitation Protocols
Phase 1
0–6 Weeks
- Protection & pain control
- Muenster splint or above-elbow cast
- WristWidget for stable lesions
- Edema management
- Gentle digital motion
Phase 2
6–12 Weeks
- Progressive forearm rotation
- Grip strengthening
- Proprioceptive training
- Scar management
Phase 3
12–24 Weeks
- Sport/occupation-specific training
- Progressive loading
- WristWidget during high-load activities
Phase 4
>24 Weeks
- Full return to activity
- WristWidget as activity brace
- Monitor for instability signs
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most common type of TFCC tear?
Palmer Class 1A (central disc perforation) is among the most commonly diagnosed TFCC tears, particularly on MRI. However, peripheral tears (Palmer 1B / Atzei Class 1–2) involving the fovea may be underdiagnosed due to imaging limitations.
Can a TFCC tear heal without surgery?
Peripheral tears (vascular zone) have inherent healing potential with appropriate immobilization, particularly in young patients with acute injuries. Central disc tears (avascular zone) do not heal on their own, but many patients achieve satisfactory symptom control with conservative management.
What is a foveal tear and why does it matter?
A foveal tear is a disruption of the deep radioulnar ligament fibers at their attachment to the fovea of the ulnar head. It is the primary cause of DRUJ instability and is the focus of Atzei Classes 1–3. Identifying and repairing foveal tears is critical to prevent chronic instability and DRUJ arthritis.
What is the trampoline test?
An arthroscopic test where a probe depresses and releases the TFCC disc to assess tension. A normal (positive) trampoline test shows a taut, resilient disc that springs back. A negative trampoline test indicates a lax, flaccid disc — suggesting loss of peripheral attachment or disc destruction.
What is the hook test?
An arthroscopic test using a probe to hook the TFCC disc from its ulnar margin and pull it distally. If the disc can be displaced (positive hook test), the peripheral/foveal attachment is disrupted. In a normal wrist, the disc is firmly anchored and cannot be hooked.
How does ulnar variance relate to TFCC pathology?
Positive ulnar variance (ulna longer than radius) increases axial load transmission through the TFCC. It is a major risk factor for degenerative TFCC lesions (Palmer Class 2) and ulnar impaction syndrome. Ulnar shortening osteotomy is often performed to reduce variance and TFCC load.
Is MRI sufficient to classify a TFCC tear?
MRI, particularly MR arthrography, is valuable for initial assessment, but arthroscopy remains the gold standard for classification (especially the Atzei system). MRI can miss foveal tears and does not assess DRUJ stability.
What is the Atzei system's greatest advantage over Palmer?
The Atzei system directly guides surgical decision-making by distinguishing reparable tears (Classes 1–2), reconstructible tears (Class 3), and salvage cases (Class 4). It highlights foveal integrity as the key determinant of DRUJ stability — a critical distinction Palmer's system does not make explicitly.
How long does recovery from a TFCC tear take?
Recovery varies by classification and treatment. Conservative management: 3–6 months. Arthroscopic debridement: 4–8 weeks. Peripheral repair and foveal reinsertion: 4–6 months. TFCC reconstruction: 6–12 months. Salvage procedures: 6–12+ months.
References
- Palmer AK. Triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions: a classification. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14(4):594–606.
- Palmer AK, Werner FW. The triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist — anatomy and function. J Hand Surg Am. 1981;6(2):153–162.
- Atzei A, Luchetti R. Foveal TFCC tear classification and treatment. Hand Clin. 2011;27(3):263–272.
- Atzei A. New trends in arthroscopic management of Type 1-B TFCC injuries with DRUJ instability. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34(5):582–591.
- Nakamura T, Makita A. Classification of the triangular fibrocartilage complex tears and clinical assessment. J Hand Surg Br. 1996.
- Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y. Functional anatomy of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21(5):581–586.
- Luchetti R, Atzei A, Cozzolino R, et al. Comparison between open and arthroscopic-assisted foveal reinsertion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex in patients with distal radio-ulnar joint instability. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;39(8):845–855.
- Haugstvedt JR, Berger RA, Nakamura T, et al. Relative contributions of the ulnar attachments of the triangular fibrocartilage complex to the dynamic stability of the distal radioulnar joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(3):445–451.
- Lindau T. Arthroscopic evaluation of associated soft tissue injuries in distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2017;33(4):651–658.
- Mak MCK, Ho PC. Arthroscopic-assisted triangular fibrocartilage complex reconstruction. Hand Clin. 2017;33(4):625–637.
- Schmauss D, Pohlmann S, Lohmeyer JA, et al. Clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging have limited diagnostic value for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(6):873–880.
This article is intended for educational purposes and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified hand surgeon for diagnosis and treatment planning. © 2026 WristWidget. All rights reserved.